Triple

T17479823
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Miller v. California E425626 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Memoirs v. Massachusetts NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Memoirs v. Massachusetts | Statement: [Miller v. California, relatedCase, Memoirs v. Massachusetts]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Memoirs v. Massachusetts
Context triple: [Miller v. California, relatedCase, Memoirs v. Massachusetts]
  • A. Memoirs v. Massachusetts chosen
    Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
  • B. Prince v. Massachusetts
    Prince v. Massachusetts is a 1944 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld state authority to regulate child labor and limit children's religiously motivated activities in public for their protection.
  • C. Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
    Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial evidence and that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to confront the analysts who prepared them.
  • D. McCullen v. Coakley
    McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
  • E. Cantwell v. Connecticut
    Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451bf1e8081909f4d4b8992412e62 completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.