Triple
T17479779
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Miller v. California |
E425626
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | landmark obscenity case |
C733
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: landmark obscenity case Context triple: [Miller v. California, instanceOf, landmark obscenity case]
-
A.
landmark case
chosen
A landmark case is a court decision that establishes a significant new legal principle or precedent, often reshaping the interpretation or application of the law.
-
B.
landmark decision
A landmark decision is a court ruling that establishes a significant new legal principle or precedent, often reshaping the interpretation or application of the law.
-
C.
criminal syndicalism case
A criminal syndicalism case is a legal proceeding in which individuals or groups are prosecuted for advocating, teaching, or organizing actions—often involving violence or sabotage—aimed at overthrowing or disrupting established government or industrial systems.
-
D.
legal scandal
A legal scandal is a widely publicized controversy arising from alleged or proven violations of law or ethical standards by individuals or organizations, often involving misconduct, corruption, or abuse of power.
-
E.
LGBT rights case
An LGBT rights case is a legal proceeding that addresses alleged discrimination, unequal treatment, or violations of civil or human rights based on sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.