Triple

T17479743
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court E425625 entity
Predicate significantCase P4528 FINISHED
Object United States v. Morrison — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Morrison | Statement: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court, significantCase, United States v. Morrison]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Morrison
Context triple: [United States Supreme Court cases of the Rehnquist Court, significantCase, United States v. Morrison]
  • A. United States v. Morrison chosen
    United States v. Morrison is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause and Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment by striking down parts of the Violence Against Women Act.
  • B. Gonzales v. Williams
    Gonzales v. Williams was a 1904 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the citizenship status of Puerto Ricans following the island’s acquisition by the United States.
  • C. Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus
    Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case addressing whether a pro-life advocacy group could challenge an Ohio law regulating false statements in political campaigns under the First Amendment.
  • D. Crawford v. Washington
    Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
  • E. Bucklew v. Precythe
    Bucklew v. Precythe is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Missouri’s method of execution against an Eighth Amendment challenge, clarifying the standards for inmates claiming that a particular execution protocol would cause them severe pain.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451bf1e8081909f4d4b8992412e62 completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.