Triple
T17479349
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Judiciary of Idaho |
E425616
|
entity |
| Predicate | headedBy |
P981
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court | Statement: [Judiciary of Idaho, headedBy, Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court Context triple: [Judiciary of Idaho, headedBy, Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court]
-
A.
Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court
The Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court is the head of the state's highest court and judicial branch, overseeing its administration, leadership, and the statewide court system.
-
B.
Chief Justice of the South Dakota Supreme Court
The Chief Justice of the South Dakota Supreme Court is the highest-ranking judicial officer in the state, responsible for leading the state’s court system and presiding over its court of last resort.
-
C.
Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court
The Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court is the head of the state’s highest court, overseeing its administration, presiding over its proceedings, and providing leadership for Arizona’s judicial branch.
-
D.
Idaho Supreme Court
The Idaho Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the state of Idaho, responsible for interpreting state law and the Idaho Constitution and issuing final appellate decisions.
-
E.
Chief Justice of California
The Chief Justice of California is the head of the state’s judicial branch and presiding officer of the Supreme Court of California, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice across the state court system.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court Target entity description: The Chief Justice of the Idaho Supreme Court is the highest-ranking judicial officer in the state, responsible for leading Idaho’s court system and presiding over its supreme court.
-
A.
Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court
The Chief Justice of the Oregon Supreme Court is the head of the state's highest court and judicial branch, overseeing its administration, leadership, and the statewide court system.
-
B.
Chief Justice of the South Dakota Supreme Court
The Chief Justice of the South Dakota Supreme Court is the highest-ranking judicial officer in the state, responsible for leading the state’s court system and presiding over its court of last resort.
-
C.
Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court
The Chief Justice of the Arizona Supreme Court is the head of the state’s highest court, overseeing its administration, presiding over its proceedings, and providing leadership for Arizona’s judicial branch.
-
D.
Idaho Supreme Court
The Idaho Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the state of Idaho, responsible for interpreting state law and the Idaho Constitution and issuing final appellate decisions.
-
E.
Chief Justice of California
The Chief Justice of California is the head of the state’s judicial branch and presiding officer of the Supreme Court of California, responsible for overseeing the administration of justice across the state court system.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e451be5fd08190aeaa12b3a6d6c6d4 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:48 a.m.