Triple

T17476013
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject After Party E425539 entity
Predicate hasStrongSocialMediaPresence P30376 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [After Party, hasStrongSocialMediaPresence, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStrongSocialMediaPresence
Context triple: [After Party, hasStrongSocialMediaPresence, true]
  • A. hasSocialEngagement
    Indicates that an entity participates in or maintains some form of social interaction, activity, or relationship with others.
  • B. hasSocialService
    Indicates that an entity provides, offers, or is associated with a social service to another entity or community.
  • C. hasSocialNetworkingIntegration
    Indicates that an entity is connected to or supports interaction with one or more social networking platforms.
  • D. isPopularOnSocialMedia chosen
    Indicates that an entity is widely followed, frequently engaged with, or broadly recognized across social media platforms.
  • E. hasSocialIdentity
    Indicates that an entity possesses or is associated with a particular social identity, such as a role, group membership, or socially recognized status.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e451bb7050819080e3873bcc8a950c completed April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b4f341c88190adabe526d8903b05 completed April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:47 a.m.