Triple
T17471240
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Leszek Czarny |
E425417
|
entity |
| Predicate | title |
P38
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Duke of Sieradz |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Duke of Sieradz | Statement: [Leszek Czarny, title, Duke of Sieradz]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Duke of Sieradz Context triple: [Leszek Czarny, title, Duke of Sieradz]
-
A.
Duke of Sieradz
chosen
The Duke of Sieradz was a medieval Polish noble title associated with the Piast dynasty and the rule over the Sieradz region in central Poland.
-
B.
Duke of Czersk
The Duke of Czersk was a medieval Polish noble title held by members of the Masovian branch of the Piast dynasty, ruling over the Czersk region in Mazovia.
-
C.
Duke of Bytom
The Duke of Bytom was a medieval Silesian noble title held by members of the Piast dynasty who ruled the Bytom region.
-
D.
Duke of Kalisz
The Duke of Kalisz was a medieval Polish princely title associated with the Piast dynasty and the rule over the important regional center of Kalisz in Greater Poland.
-
E.
Duke of Ścinawa
The Duke of Ścinawa was a medieval Silesian Piast ruler who governed the duchy centered on the town of Ścinawa in what is now southwestern Poland.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889dbc2e88190b18ea6115e819258 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e451abab908190b6d9d8a64f7c2ea3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:53 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:47 a.m.