Triple
T17453299
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jeeter Frye |
E424967
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGivenName |
P17
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jeeter |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jeeter | Statement: [Jeeter Frye, hasGivenName, Jeeter]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Jeeter Context triple: [Jeeter Frye, hasGivenName, Jeeter]
-
A.
Jeeter Fry
Jeeter Fry is the original character from the stage musical "Oklahoma!" on whom the darker, reimagined Jud Fry in the film adaptation was based.
-
B.
Jeeter Frye
chosen
Jeeter Frye is a fictional character whose name appears as a variant of "Jeeter Fry" in literary or media references.
-
C.
Winchell
Winchell is a surname most famously associated with Walter Winchell, a prominent 20th-century American newspaper and radio gossip columnist.
-
D.
Jake Pickle
Jake Pickle was a long-serving Democratic U.S. Representative from Texas known for his influential work on tax legislation and Social Security reform.
-
E.
Elwood Mead
Elwood Mead was an American engineer and public official who served as U.S. Commissioner of Reclamation and oversaw major Western water projects, including the development associated with Hoover Dam.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889db0ba481908402409af3b37917 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e451406c748190b5ac6aacff7a3cc7 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:51 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:47 a.m.