Triple
T17450609
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | J Harlen Bretz |
E424901
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableIdeaStatus |
P118158
|
FINISHED |
| Object | initially controversial |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: initially controversial | Statement: [J Harlen Bretz, notableIdeaStatus, initially controversial]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: notableIdeaStatus Context triple: [J Harlen Bretz, notableIdeaStatus, initially controversial]
-
A.
notableInformationStatus
chosen
Indicates that there exists noteworthy or significant information about an entity and specifies the status or condition of that information (e.g., confirmed, unverified, disputed, or missing).
-
B.
notableState
Indicates that an entity is significantly associated with, recognized in, or prominently linked to a particular state (such as a U.S. state or similar regional jurisdiction).
-
C.
notablePlan
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having a significant or noteworthy plan associated with it.
-
D.
notableProposal
Indicates that an entity is a proposal distinguished by particular significance, impact, or recognition compared to other proposals.
-
E.
notableStandard
Indicates that one entity is a widely recognized or influential standard that the other entity is associated with or exemplifies.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889db0ba481908402409af3b37917 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4513d00f48190802a3bdc8c8f4db5 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:51 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4f0e3fc819094e466b74622c956 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:47 a.m.