Triple
T17446791
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Banabans |
E424806
|
entity |
| Predicate | historicalLegalAction |
P20840
|
FINISHED |
| Object | compensation claims for phosphate mining |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: compensation claims for phosphate mining | Statement: [Banabans, historicalLegalAction, compensation claims for phosphate mining]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalLegalAction Context triple: [Banabans, historicalLegalAction, compensation claims for phosphate mining]
-
A.
legalHistory
chosen
Indicates that there exists a record of past legal actions, cases, or statuses associated with an entity.
-
B.
historicalLaw
Indicates that the referenced law or legal provision existed and was in effect during a past historical period, rather than being current.
-
C.
historicalIssue
Indicates that one entity is a past or previously existing edition, version, or instance of another entity, typically within a chronological sequence.
-
D.
historicalMovementAssociatedWith
Indicates that there is an association between an entity and a historical movement, such as a social, political, cultural, or ideological current in history.
-
E.
historicalJurisdiction
Indicates that one entity previously held legal or administrative authority over another entity during a past time period.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889db0ba481908402409af3b37917 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e44ffc89e4819096372cc55b40cc3b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:46 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b4f0e3fc819094e466b74622c956 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:47 a.m.