Triple
T17446495
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Schertz |
E424798
|
entity |
| Predicate | county |
P75
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Comal County |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Comal County | Statement: [Schertz, county, Comal County]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Comal County Context triple: [Schertz, county, Comal County]
-
A.
Comal County
chosen
Comal County is a county in south-central Texas known for its scenic Hill Country landscapes, rivers, and rapidly growing communities such as New Braunfels.
-
B.
Ector County
Ector County is a county in western Texas best known for encompassing the city of Odessa and its significant role in the Permian Basin oil industry.
-
C.
Atascosa County
Atascosa County is a largely rural county in southern Texas known for its agricultural economy and proximity to the San Antonio metropolitan area.
-
D.
Hidalgo County
Hidalgo County is a populous county in South Texas along the U.S.–Mexico border, known for its rapidly growing communities and role in the Rio Grande Valley region.
-
E.
Hays County
Hays County is a rapidly growing county in Central Texas, located just southwest of Austin and known for its Hill Country landscapes and suburban communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889db0ba481908402409af3b37917 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e44ffc89e4819096372cc55b40cc3b |
completed | April 19, 2026, 3:46 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:47 a.m.