Triple

T17423670
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Lydia of Croesus E423680 entity
Predicate coinageInnovation P99871 FINISHED
Object standardized bimetallic coinage LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: standardized bimetallic coinage | Statement: [Lydia of Croesus, coinageInnovation, standardized bimetallic coinage]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: coinageInnovation
Context triple: [Lydia of Croesus, coinageInnovation, standardized bimetallic coinage]
  • A. coinageFeature chosen
    Indicates a characteristic, design element, or attribute that is present on or associated with a particular coin or type of coinage.
  • B. coinageType
    Indicates the specific type or category of coinage associated with an entity, such as its denomination, series, or monetary classification.
  • C. coinagePower
    Indicates the authority or capacity of an entity to create, issue, or regulate currency or coinage.
  • D. coinageMotivation
    Indicates the reason or purpose motivating the creation or introduction of a particular coinage or monetary issue.
  • E. banknoteInnovation
    Indicates the introduction or development of new features, designs, or technologies in banknotes.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889d88b6081908bada047f5b3ba51 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e44238b418819095c6a013d3ff3b17 completed April 19, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b02e6cc88190986e85e64ce9383e completed April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:46 a.m.