Triple

T17417507
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject VP9 E423522 entity
Predicate compressionEfficiencyComparedToH264 P127373 FINISHED
Object higher at same visual quality LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: higher at same visual quality | Statement: [VP9, compressionEfficiencyComparedToH264, higher at same visual quality]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: compressionEfficiencyComparedToH264
Context triple: [VP9, compressionEfficiencyComparedToH264, higher at same visual quality]
  • A. advantageOverMPEG-PS
    Indicates that one entity has a benefit or superiority compared to MPEG-PS in some aspect or use case.
  • B. compressionLoss
    Indicates that some amount of information, quality, or fidelity is lost as a result of a compression process.
  • C. compressionRatio
    Indicates the proportional reduction in size or volume achieved when something is compressed compared to its original size.
  • D. compressionType
    Indicates the method or format used to compress data or content in the relationship.
  • E. supportsHEVCEncode
    Indicates that one entity provides the capability for another entity to perform HEVC (High Efficiency Video Coding) encoding.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889d7d27c819088486ce3f0627fa1 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e44233c7888190a4d2aa703b206851 completed April 19, 2026, 2:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3b02e6cc88190986e85e64ce9383e completed April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e3b2a33e8481908fa6ef45290d08aa completed April 18, 2026, 4:34 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:46 a.m.