Triple
T17391701
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Places for Everyone |
E422838
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | joint development plan |
C20610
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: joint development plan Context triple: [Places for Everyone, instanceOf, joint development plan]
-
A.
joint management arrangement
A joint management arrangement is a structured agreement in which two or more parties share authority, responsibilities, and decision-making over a specific resource, project, or organization.
-
B.
collaborative research and development agreement
A collaborative research and development agreement is a contract between two or more parties that defines how they will jointly conduct R&D activities, share resources, allocate intellectual property rights, and manage risks and responsibilities.
-
C.
partition plan
A partition plan is a detailed layout or strategy that defines how a space, dataset, or resource is divided into distinct sections or segments according to specific criteria or requirements.
-
D.
intergovernmental action plan
chosen
An intergovernmental action plan is a coordinated framework of policies, objectives, and implementation steps jointly developed and agreed upon by multiple governments to address shared issues or goals across jurisdictions.
-
E.
partnership agreement
A partnership agreement is a legally binding contract between two or more parties that defines their business relationship, including ownership shares, roles, responsibilities, profit and loss distribution, and procedures for decision-making and dispute resolution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d710288190bf0f4762801fefae |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:45 a.m.