Triple
T17383275
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Joint Powers Authority of member cities |
E422622
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayContractWith |
P127280
|
FINISHED |
| Object | private transit operators |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: private transit operators | Statement: [Joint Powers Authority of member cities, mayContractWith, private transit operators]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayContractWith Context triple: [Joint Powers Authority of member cities, mayContractWith, private transit operators]
-
A.
managedUnderContractWith
Indicates that one entity is responsible for managing another entity or service based on the terms of a formal contract with a specified party.
-
B.
mayHold
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
-
C.
mayGuarantee
Indicates that one entity has the potential or authority to provide a guarantee for another entity or outcome.
-
D.
maySign
Indicates that an entity has the permission or authority to sign a document, agreement, or similar item.
-
E.
hasContractWith
Indicates that one entity is bound by a formal contract or agreement with another entity.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d6535c81908be333c01deaec4e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43a87d9948190986021f1fb5a4e00 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b02ac8688190a7182f1b2151d721 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e3b2a33e8481908fa6ef45290d08aa |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:34 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:45 a.m.