Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Shaw v. Reno | Statement: [Bush v. Vera, extendsPrinciplesOf, Shaw v. Reno]

Target entity: Shaw v. Reno
Context triple: [Bush v. Vera, extendsPrinciplesOf, Shaw v. Reno]

• A. Shaw v. Reno chosen
  Shaw v. Reno is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited the use of race in legislative redistricting by holding that bizarrely shaped, race-based districts can violate the Constitution.
• B. Thornburg v. Gingles
  Thornburg v. Gingles is a landmark 1986 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the primary legal test for proving vote dilution claims under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
• C. Wesberry v. Sanders
  Wesberry v. Sanders is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle that congressional districts must be drawn so that each person's vote is as equal in weight as practicable, laying groundwork for the "one person, one vote" standard.
• D. Baker v. Carr
  Baker v. Carr is a landmark 1962 U.S. Supreme Court case that established federal courts’ authority to hear legislative redistricting disputes under the Equal Protection Clause, paving the way for the “one person, one vote” principle.
• E. South Carolina v. Katzenbach
  South Carolina v. Katzenbach is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the constitutionality of key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, affirming broad federal power to combat racial discrimination in voting.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: extendsPrinciplesOf
Context triple: [Bush v. Vera, extendsPrinciplesOf, Shaw v. Reno]

• A. implementsPrinciple
  Indicates that an entity applies, follows, or puts into practice a specified principle in its design, behavior, or operation.
• B. establishesPrinciple
  Indicates that an entity formulates, defines, or sets forth a foundational rule, guideline, or standard that others are expected to follow or build upon.
• C. includePrinciple chosen
  Indicates that one entity incorporates, embodies, or is based on a particular principle defined by another entity.
• D. usesPrinciple
  Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
• E. typeOfPrinciples
  Indicates a relationship where one entity specifies the kind or category of principles that another entity embodies, uses, or is governed by.
• F. None of above.