Triple
T17374523
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shaw v. Hunt |
E422401
|
entity |
| Predicate | fullCaseName |
P3131
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Shaw et al. v. Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shaw et al. v. Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. | Statement: [Shaw v. Hunt, fullCaseName, Shaw et al. v. Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al.]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Shaw et al. v. Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al. Context triple: [Shaw v. Hunt, fullCaseName, Shaw et al. v. Hunt, Governor of North Carolina, et al.]
-
A.
Shaw v. Hunt
chosen
Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
-
B.
Woodson v. North Carolina
Woodson v. North Carolina is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down mandatory death penalty statutes as unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.
-
C.
Heien v. North Carolina
Heien v. North Carolina is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a police officer’s reasonable mistake of law can still provide the reasonable suspicion necessary to justify a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.
-
D.
Edwards v. South Carolina
Edwards v. South Carolina is a landmark 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision that overturned the breach-of-the-peace convictions of civil rights demonstrators, affirming their First Amendment rights to peaceful protest and assembly.
-
E.
Chisholm v. Georgia
Chisholm v. Georgia was a 1793 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a state could be sued in federal court by a citizen of another state, a ruling that led directly to the adoption of the Eleventh Amendment limiting such suits.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d6535c81908be333c01deaec4e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43a6b71148190bb10e1fac400d6c3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:44 a.m.