Triple
T17372159
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Julius König |
E422342
|
entity |
| Predicate | notableWork |
P4
|
FINISHED |
| Object | König's lemma |
—
|
NE ONNED1 |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: König's lemma | Statement: [Julius König, notableWork, König's lemma]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: König's lemma Context triple: [Julius König, notableWork, König's lemma]
-
A.
Kruskal's tree theorem
Kruskal's tree theorem is a fundamental result in combinatorics and mathematical logic stating that finite trees are well-quasi-ordered under homeomorphic embedding, with deep implications in proof theory and computer science.
-
B.
Ky Fan’s lemma
Ky Fan’s lemma is a combinatorial topological result that generalizes Tucker’s lemma and provides conditions guaranteeing the existence of certain balanced or fully labeled simplices in labeled triangulations of spheres or simplices.
-
C.
Bailey lemma
The Bailey lemma is a key result in the theory of basic hypergeometric series that provides a systematic method for generating Rogers–Ramanujan-type identities and other q-series relations.
-
D.
Robbins lemma
Robbins lemma is a result in probability theory that provides a bound on the expected maximum of partial sums of independent random variables, named after mathematician Herbert Robbins.
-
E.
Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz lemma
The Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz lemma is a fundamental result in combinatorial topology that guarantees the existence of a point common to a family of closed sets covering a simplex under certain intersection conditions, and underlies several fixed-point theorems.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: König's lemma Target entity description: König's lemma is a fundamental result in graph theory and logic stating that every finitely branching infinite tree has an infinite path.
-
A.
Kruskal's tree theorem
Kruskal's tree theorem is a fundamental result in combinatorics and mathematical logic stating that finite trees are well-quasi-ordered under homeomorphic embedding, with deep implications in proof theory and computer science.
-
B.
Ky Fan’s lemma
Ky Fan’s lemma is a combinatorial topological result that generalizes Tucker’s lemma and provides conditions guaranteeing the existence of certain balanced or fully labeled simplices in labeled triangulations of spheres or simplices.
-
C.
Bailey lemma
The Bailey lemma is a key result in the theory of basic hypergeometric series that provides a systematic method for generating Rogers–Ramanujan-type identities and other q-series relations.
-
D.
Robbins lemma
Robbins lemma is a result in probability theory that provides a bound on the expected maximum of partial sums of independent random variables, named after mathematician Herbert Robbins.
-
E.
Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz lemma
The Knaster–Kuratowski–Mazurkiewicz lemma is a fundamental result in combinatorial topology that guarantees the existence of a point common to a family of closed sets covering a simplex under certain intersection conditions, and underlies several fixed-point theorems.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d6535c81908be333c01deaec4e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43a69d93c81908ce2d909857a3a11 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a019568a27c8190af1bbe6db75f3e6f |
in_progress | May 11, 2026, 8:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:44 a.m.