Triple
T17371083
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Flå |
E422314
|
entity |
| Predicate | administrativeCentre |
P1474
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Flå (village) |
—
|
NE ONNED1 |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Flå (village) | Statement: [Flå, administrativeCentre, Flå (village)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Flå (village) Context triple: [Flå, administrativeCentre, Flå (village)]
-
A.
municipality of Flå
The municipality of Flå is a small rural community in southeastern Norway known for its forested landscapes, wildlife, and outdoor recreation opportunities.
-
B.
Flå parish
Flå parish is a Church of Norway parish serving the local Lutheran congregation in the Flå area of Buskerud, Norway.
-
C.
Flå
chosen
Flå is a small rural municipality in Viken county, Norway, known for its forested landscapes, outdoor recreation, and location in the Hallingdal valley.
-
D.
Våler village
Våler village is a small settlement in Østfold, Norway, serving as the local hub for municipal services, commerce, and community life.
-
E.
Kvam village
Kvam village is a small rural settlement in Innlandet county, Norway, known for its scenic valley setting and traditional Norwegian countryside character.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d6535c81908be333c01deaec4e |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43a68ff448190b505861e56df5b6d |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:14 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a019568a27c8190af1bbe6db75f3e6f |
in_progress | May 11, 2026, 8:38 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:44 a.m.