Triple
T17354918
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Assistant United States Attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia |
E421908
|
entity |
| Predicate | appliesLaw |
P125
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Federal Rules of Evidence |
E13641
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Federal Rules of Evidence | Statement: [Assistant United States Attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia, appliesLaw, Federal Rules of Evidence]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Federal Rules of Evidence Context triple: [Assistant United States Attorneys in the Northern District of Georgia, appliesLaw, Federal Rules of Evidence]
-
A.
rules of evidence for the federal courts
chosen
The rules of evidence for the federal courts are a comprehensive set of legal standards that govern what information may be presented and considered in United States federal court proceedings.
-
B.
Washington Rules of Evidence
The Washington Rules of Evidence are a codified set of legal standards governing the admissibility and use of evidence in Washington State courts.
-
C.
Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603
Federal Rules of Evidence Rule 603 is the U.S. evidentiary rule that requires witnesses to take an oath or affirmation to testify truthfully before giving evidence in court.
-
D.
Federal Rule of Evidence 1006
Federal Rule of Evidence 1006 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows parties to present the contents of voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs in the form of summaries, charts, or calculations when the originals would be too cumbersome to examine in court.
-
E.
Federal Rule of Evidence 1007
Federal Rule of Evidence 1007 is a U.S. evidentiary rule that allows a party to prove the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph through the testimony or written statement of the opposing party without producing the original.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d520008190a26917a95bf1c2ea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43a2f26548190a8822b2470ec3c72 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a01955c37b48190bcef819e106005d2 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 8:37 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:44 a.m.