Triple
T17353279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Befehlstaktik |
E421865
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOppositePrinciple |
P21665
|
FINISHED |
| Object | mission-type tactics |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: mission-type tactics | Statement: [Befehlstaktik, hasOppositePrinciple, mission-type tactics]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOppositePrinciple Context triple: [Befehlstaktik, hasOppositePrinciple, mission-type tactics]
-
A.
hasConceptualOpposite
chosen
Indicates that one entity represents a concept that is fundamentally opposed or contrary in meaning to the concept represented by another entity.
-
B.
theoryOpposed
Indicates that one theory stands in opposition to, or conflicts with, another theory.
-
C.
isOppositionCounterpartOf
Indicates a relationship where one entity serves as the opposing or counterpart force, side, or position to another within a conflict, competition, or contrast.
-
D.
typeOfOpposition
Indicates a relationship where one entity stands in opposition or contrast to another, such as being a rival, adversary, or countering force.
-
E.
usesPrinciple
Indicates that one entity applies, relies on, or is based upon a particular principle in its functioning, reasoning, or design.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d520008190a26917a95bf1c2ea |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e43a2e660c81908700aed5c42e9043 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b02662d08190a07d0fb5c04b6f33 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:44 a.m.