Triple
T17330309
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lefschetz fibration |
E420794
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeCompatibleWith |
P48645
|
FINISHED |
| Object | symplectic form |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: symplectic form | Statement: [Lefschetz fibration, canBeCompatibleWith, symplectic form]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeCompatibleWith Context triple: [Lefschetz fibration, canBeCompatibleWith, symplectic form]
-
A.
checksCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity evaluates whether it is compatible or can function harmoniously with another entity.
-
B.
isGenerallyCompatibleWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities can typically function or coexist together without significant conflict, issues, or need for special adaptation.
-
C.
canBeAdaptedBy
Indicates that one entity is capable of being modified, adjusted, or tailored for use by another entity.
-
D.
requiresCompatibilityWith
Indicates that one entity can only function correctly or be used if it is compatible with another specified entity.
-
E.
canCoexistWith
Indicates that two entities are able to exist together in the same context or environment without conflict, interference, or mutual exclusion.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d3adc881909319f1edb8d2a956 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e439d5c788819092bdc4d3de0ec958 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b021a5bc81909ae55406f9d0b37f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:43 a.m.