Triple

T17328814
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Dayton, Minnesota E420758 entity
Predicate adjacentTo P224 FINISHED
Object Otsego, Minnesota E1091228 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Otsego, Minnesota | Statement: [Dayton, Minnesota, adjacentTo, Otsego, Minnesota]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Otsego, Minnesota
Context triple: [Dayton, Minnesota, adjacentTo, Otsego, Minnesota]
  • A. Otsego, Minnesota chosen
    Otsego, Minnesota is a growing suburban city in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area known for its residential communities along the Mississippi River.
  • B. Osseo, Minnesota
    Osseo, Minnesota is a small suburban city in Hennepin County that forms part of the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metropolitan area.
  • C. Ostrander, Minnesota
    Ostrander, Minnesota is a small rural city located in southeastern Minnesota within Fillmore County.
  • D. Isanti, Minnesota
    Isanti, Minnesota is a small city in east-central Minnesota known for its rural character and location within the northern Twin Cities metropolitan area.
  • E. Keewatin, Minnesota
    Keewatin, Minnesota is a small city on the Iron Range in northern Minnesota known historically for its taconite mining industry.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d889d3adc881909319f1edb8d2a956 completed April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e439d50b308190a255874a9b8f3cd3 completed April 19, 2026, 2:11 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a018c4dff088190833122dbe2981045 completed May 11, 2026, 7:59 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:43 a.m.