Triple
T1732534
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hatikvah |
E37844
|
entity |
| Predicate | melodyPossiblyDerivedFrom |
P1148
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Romanian folk music |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Romanian folk music | Statement: [Hatikvah, melodyPossiblyDerivedFrom, Romanian folk music]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: melodyPossiblyDerivedFrom Context triple: [Hatikvah, melodyPossiblyDerivedFrom, Romanian folk music]
-
A.
melodyOrigin
chosen
Indicates the source or provenance from which a particular melody is derived or originally created.
-
B.
hasMelody
Indicates that one entity possesses, contains, or is characterized by a particular melody.
-
C.
isEarlierUseOfMelodyThan
Indicates that one use of a melody occurs at an earlier time than another use of the same or comparable melody.
-
D.
inspiredSong
Indicates that one entity (such as an event, person, or work) served as the creative inspiration or motivating influence for the creation of a particular song.
-
E.
notableSongCharacteristic
Indicates that a song is distinguished by a particular notable feature or quality, such as style, structure, or performance trait.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861cc6ac8190ac0b2e31ccf62851 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:21 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab5c553e508190b0f511b05e07fa20 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 10:59 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61c25a648190892de94c997fb983 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.