Triple
T17314933
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Winipēk |
E420396
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatesToHydrologicalFeature |
P31054
|
FINISHED |
| Object | lake |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: lake | Statement: [Winipēk, relatesToHydrologicalFeature, lake]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relatesToHydrologicalFeature Context triple: [Winipēk, relatesToHydrologicalFeature, lake]
-
A.
hasHydrologicalRelation
Indicates a relationship between entities based on the movement, distribution, or connection of water within or between hydrological features or systems.
-
B.
hydrologyFeature
chosen
Indicates a relationship where one entity is a hydrological feature (such as a body or flow of water) associated with or characterizing another entity.
-
C.
hydrologicallyConnectedTo
Indicates that two water bodies or hydrological features are linked such that water can flow or be transferred between them, directly or indirectly, through the hydrological system.
-
D.
hasWaterwayRole
Indicates that an entity participates in or is associated with a waterway in a specific functional capacity or role.
-
E.
riverRelation
Indicates a spatial or geographic relationship between one river and another, such as confluence, branching, or relative positioning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d889d22b848190a4663d0b8f8f76e7 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:25 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e4399c6ad88190ba7fcf1d2d53171c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 2:10 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3b01b9d1c8190a406dd941c9b11a1 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:43 a.m.