Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke | Statement: [Isabel de Clare, 4th Countess of Pembroke, inheritedFrom, Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke]

Target entity: Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke
Context triple: [Isabel de Clare, 4th Countess of Pembroke, inheritedFrom, Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke]

• A. Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke chosen
  Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke—also known as Strongbow—was a 12th-century Anglo-Norman nobleman and military leader famed for his pivotal role in the Norman invasion of Ireland.
• B. Gilbert de Clare, 1st Earl of Pembroke
  Gilbert de Clare, 1st Earl of Pembroke, was a prominent 12th-century Anglo-Norman nobleman and military leader who played a key role in the Norman consolidation of power in Wales and the Welsh Marches.
• C. William de Valence, 1st Earl of Pembroke
  William de Valence, 1st Earl of Pembroke, was a prominent 13th-century Anglo-French nobleman and half-brother of King Henry III who became a powerful marcher lord in Wales and a key figure in the politics of medieval England.
• D. Richard de Clare, 3rd Earl of Hertford
  Richard de Clare, 3rd Earl of Hertford, was a prominent 13th-century English nobleman and member of the powerful de Clare family, influential in both politics and ecclesiastical patronage.
• E. Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester
  Gilbert de Clare, Earl of Gloucester, was a powerful 13th-century English nobleman and military leader who played a pivotal role in the conflicts between the crown and the barons, particularly during the reign of Henry III and Edward I.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.