Triple
T17274034
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jim Foster |
E419338
|
entity |
| Predicate | inceptionOfIdea |
P103096
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concept of arena football |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: concept of arena football | Statement: [Jim Foster, inceptionOfIdea, concept of arena football]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: inceptionOfIdea Context triple: [Jim Foster, inceptionOfIdea, concept of arena football]
-
A.
hasIdea
Indicates that an entity possesses, holds, or originates a particular idea.
-
B.
hasBrightIdea
Indicates that an entity conceives or possesses a clever, insightful, or innovative idea.
-
C.
coreIdea
Indicates the central concept or primary message that underlies or unifies something, such as a text, argument, or work.
-
D.
hasAuthorIdea
chosen
Indicates that an author is associated with or responsible for originating a particular idea.
-
E.
anticipatesIdeaIn
Indicates that one entity expects, predicts, or foresees the idea or concept that will be introduced or held by another entity in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886da626481908a14ce7830329a35 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42f4c209c81909c713ed78f2cb19a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3832c3b98819091967ac7e91ba316 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:40 a.m.