Triple
T17269442
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nicodemus |
E419213
|
entity |
| Predicate | argumentInJohn7 |
P2397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | law should not judge a man without hearing him |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: law should not judge a man without hearing him | Statement: [Nicodemus, argumentInJohn7, law should not judge a man without hearing him]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: argumentInJohn7 Context triple: [Nicodemus, argumentInJohn7, law should not judge a man without hearing him]
-
A.
argumentOf
Indicates that one entity functions as an argument (participant or operand) in relation to another entity, such as a predicate, event, or expression.
-
B.
arguesThat
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
C.
arguedUnder
Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
-
D.
argumentPositionOfCrito
Indicates that a specific argument occurs at a particular position within the dialogue or text of Crito.
-
E.
usedInArgumentAbout
Indicates that something (such as a statement, example, or piece of evidence) is employed as part of the reasoning or support within a particular argument or debate.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886da626481908a14ce7830329a35 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42f4803b48190894b3bb9a4970602 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:26 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3832a284481908a8a3da7ac91de5a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:40 a.m.