Triple
T17259990
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brush Dance |
E418983
|
entity |
| Predicate | language |
P15
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Karuk language |
E76094
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Karuk language | Statement: [Brush Dance, language, Karuk language]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Karuk language Context triple: [Brush Dance, language, Karuk language]
-
A.
Karuk language
chosen
The Karuk language is an indigenous Native American language traditionally spoken by the Karuk people of northwestern California along the Klamath River.
-
B.
Yurok language
The Yurok language is an endangered Native American language traditionally spoken by the Yurok people of northwestern California.
-
C.
Yakama language
The Yakama language is a Native American Sahaptin language traditionally spoken by the Yakama people of the Pacific Northwest region of the United States.
-
D.
Mutsun language
The Mutsun language is an extinct Ohlone (Costanoan) Native American language once spoken in the central coastal region of California.
-
E.
Miwok languages
Miwok languages are a group of closely related Native American languages traditionally spoken by the Miwok peoples of central and northern California.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d9ab108190b70edd8d17aa1204 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42e6fa940819089046d1b12dede2c |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a017101d5dc8190ac6507344897b0f3 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 6:02 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:39 a.m.