Triple
T17254894
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ondenc |
E418854
|
entity |
| Predicate | sweetWineSuitability |
P126732
|
FINISHED |
| Object | botrytised wines |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: botrytised wines | Statement: [Ondenc, sweetWineSuitability, botrytised wines]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sweetWineSuitability Context triple: [Ondenc, sweetWineSuitability, botrytised wines]
-
A.
wineServingSuggestion
Indicates the recommended way or context in which a particular wine is best served or enjoyed.
-
B.
wineStyle
Indicates the stylistic category or type of wine (such as its production style, sweetness, body, or other defining characteristics) associated with an entity.
-
C.
wineSpeciality
Indicates that an entity (such as a person, place, or establishment) is particularly known for, focused on, or distinguished by a specific type or aspect of wine.
-
D.
wineVariety
Indicates the specific type or variety of wine associated with an entity.
-
E.
wineStylesAssociatedWith
Indicates a relationship where certain wine styles are linked or connected to a particular entity, such as a region, grape, producer, or product.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d9ab108190b70edd8d17aa1204 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42e6c362c819088965c6e05f33faf |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3832a284481908a8a3da7ac91de5a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e39c2fedb881908bfed2c3e5f2616a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:39 a.m.