Triple
T17253088
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Baha al-Dawla |
E418806
|
entity |
| Predicate | relative |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Samsam al-Dawla |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Samsam al-Dawla | Statement: [Baha al-Dawla, relative, Samsam al-Dawla]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Samsam al-Dawla Context triple: [Baha al-Dawla, relative, Samsam al-Dawla]
-
A.
Samsam al-Dawla
chosen
Samsam al-Dawla was a 10th-century Buyid ruler who governed parts of Iran and Iraq during the dynasty’s height of power.
-
B.
Majd al-Dawla
Majd al-Dawla was a Buyid ruler of Rayy in the late 10th and early 11th centuries, known for his weak reign under the dominance of powerful amirs and his mother Sayyida Shirin.
-
C.
Rukn al-Dawla
Rukn al-Dawla was a prominent 10th-century Buyid ruler who consolidated Buyid power in western Iran and played a key role in the dynasty’s political ascendancy.
-
D.
Shams al-Dawla
Shams al-Dawla was a Buyid dynasty ruler who governed parts of western Iran in the late 10th and early 11th centuries.
-
E.
Izz al-Dawla
Izz al-Dawla was a 10th-century Buyid ruler of Iraq who succeeded his father Muizz al-Dawla and struggled to maintain control amid internal dynastic conflicts and external threats.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d9ab108190b70edd8d17aa1204 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42e6a1b648190a8bb2deb67bbdfdc |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:22 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:39 a.m.