Triple
T1724853
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Communities of Belgium |
E37473
|
entity |
| Predicate | reformContext |
P24524
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Belgian state reform |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Belgian state reform | Statement: [Communities of Belgium, reformContext, Belgian state reform]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reformContext Context triple: [Communities of Belgium, reformContext, Belgian state reform]
-
A.
reform
Indicates bringing about significant changes to an existing system, practice, or entity in order to improve or correct it.
-
B.
isPartOfReform
chosen
Indicates that an action, measure, or component belongs to, contributes to, or is included within a broader reform initiative or process.
-
C.
scriptAfterReform
Indicates that one script or writing system is used after a reform or modification has been applied to another script.
-
D.
reformDate
Indicates the date on which a reform, change, or restructuring officially took effect or was implemented.
-
E.
notableReform
Indicates that an entity is recognized for having initiated, led, or been central to a significant reform or transformative change in a system, policy, or institution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861acab88190bb43cde203429399 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69aadb7bda1081908f2c41c520c9c55c |
completed | March 6, 2026, 1:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61c0a0288190bce9d60062a84b69 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.