Triple
T17229082
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | John Stuart Mill as logician |
E418195
|
entity |
| Predicate | positionOnScientificLaws |
P6571
|
FINISHED |
| Object | laws as generalized uniformities of nature |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: laws as generalized uniformities of nature | Statement: [John Stuart Mill as logician, positionOnScientificLaws, laws as generalized uniformities of nature]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: positionOnScientificLaws Context triple: [John Stuart Mill as logician, positionOnScientificLaws, laws as generalized uniformities of nature]
-
A.
positionOnScience
chosen
Indicates the stance, viewpoint, or attitude an entity holds regarding science or scientific matters.
-
B.
positionOnLaw
Indicates a stance, opinion, or interpretation that an entity holds regarding a specific law or legal provision.
-
C.
isScientific
Indicates that something pertains to or is based on systematic scientific methods, principles, or knowledge.
-
D.
consideredByScience
Indicates that something is regarded, evaluated, or treated as valid or relevant within the framework, methods, or consensus of scientific inquiry.
-
E.
positionOnTruth
Indicates the stance or viewpoint an entity holds regarding the truth or falsity of a given claim or proposition.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d8e96081909870bff6c3d0bf09 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42df55e788190b442ffd4fac768c9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:20 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3832553ac819091aa917c84f755b6 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:12 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:39 a.m.