Triple

T17215670
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Acto Colonial E417845 entity
Predicate reinforcesPowerOf P82640 FINISHED
Object Portuguese central government LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Portuguese central government | Statement: [Acto Colonial, reinforcesPowerOf, Portuguese central government]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: reinforcesPowerOf
Context triple: [Acto Colonial, reinforcesPowerOf, Portuguese central government]
  • A. enhancesPowersOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity increases, amplifies, or strengthens the abilities or powers of another entity.
  • B. strengthens
    Indicates that one entity increases the power, effectiveness, or resilience of another.
  • C. emphasizesPowerOver
    Indicates a relationship where one entity highlights, prioritizes, or asserts dominance, control, or authority over another.
  • D. strengthensFrom
    Indicates that one entity becomes stronger, more effective, or more intense as a result of influence, support, or input from another entity.
  • E. reinforcedIn
    Indicates that one entity is strengthened, supported, or made more robust within, or as a result of conditions in, another entity or context.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886d779488190b131369541c04e7d completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e42dc9f96881909eb86786a76e17e4 completed April 19, 2026, 1:20 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e3831e354881908c5505ffd15c84e9 completed April 18, 2026, 1:11 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.