Triple

T17207013
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Delgamuukw v. British Columbia E417628 entity
Predicate alsoKnownAs P39 FINISHED
Object Delgamuukw v. The Queen E417628 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Delgamuukw v. The Queen | Statement: [Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, alsoKnownAs, Delgamuukw v. The Queen]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Delgamuukw v. The Queen
Context triple: [Delgamuukw v. British Columbia, alsoKnownAs, Delgamuukw v. The Queen]
  • A. Delgamuukw v. British Columbia chosen
    Delgamuukw v. British Columbia is a landmark 1997 Supreme Court of Canada decision that fundamentally defined and affirmed the nature, scope, and constitutional protection of Aboriginal title in Canada.
  • B. Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia
    Tsilhqot'in Nation v. British Columbia is a landmark 2014 Supreme Court of Canada decision that for the first time recognized Aboriginal title to a specific tract of land, affirming the Tsilhqot'in people's land rights and significantly shaping Indigenous land claims law in Canada.
  • C. Heiltsuk Nation v. British Columbia
    Heiltsuk Nation v. British Columbia is a Canadian court case in which the Heiltsuk First Nation challenged provincial authority and asserted their Aboriginal rights and title over traditional territories and marine resources on the Pacific coast.
  • D. R. v. Sparrow
    R. v. Sparrow is a landmark 1990 Supreme Court of Canada decision that affirmed and clarified the constitutional protection of Indigenous fishing rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
  • E. British Columbia Treaty Process
    The British Columbia Treaty Process is a negotiation framework established to resolve outstanding land claims and define modern treaty relationships between First Nations, the provincial government, and the federal government in British Columbia.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886d6ba8c819093215917b3d01689 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e42dc193488190a2c5a48ce7f631a9 completed April 19, 2026, 1:20 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a0180c85b148190825bc99b28363c89 completed May 11, 2026, 7:10 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.