Triple
T17203157
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Indiana city courts |
E417529
|
entity |
| Predicate | courtOfRecordStatus |
P96279
|
FINISHED |
| Object | often not court of record |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: often not court of record | Statement: [Indiana city courts, courtOfRecordStatus, often not court of record]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: courtOfRecordStatus Context triple: [Indiana city courts, courtOfRecordStatus, often not court of record]
-
A.
courtStatus
Indicates the current legal or procedural state of a case or matter within a court system.
-
B.
isCourtOfRecord
chosen
Indicates that a particular court maintains a permanent, authoritative record of its proceedings and has the power to fine or imprison for contempt.
-
C.
judicialStatus
Indicates the legal or court-related condition or standing of an entity within a judicial process (e.g., pending, decided, appealed).
-
D.
judicialReviewStatus
Indicates whether and how a decision, action, or law has been or can be examined, challenged, or ruled upon by a judicial authority.
-
E.
legalStatusOfProceedings
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of a set of legal proceedings within a judicial or administrative process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d6ba8c819093215917b3d01689 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42db11fc881908291bf29cc740e09 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3831e354881908c5505ffd15c84e9 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.