Triple
T1719472
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Win32 API |
E37357
|
entity |
| Predicate | callConvention |
P31945
|
FINISHED |
| Object | stdcall |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stdcall | Statement: [Win32 API, callConvention, stdcall]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: callConvention Context triple: [Win32 API, callConvention, stdcall]
-
A.
logicConvention
Indicates a relationship where entities participate in or are associated with a convention, event, or standard related to logic or logical systems.
-
B.
hasSignConvention
Indicates that a particular system, quantity, or representation follows a specified rule for assigning positive and negative signs.
-
C.
callsFor
Indicates that one entity requires, demands, or requests the occurrence of another action, condition, or entity.
-
D.
protocolFunction
Indicates that one entity serves as a function, role, or operation defined within the rules or structure of a particular protocol for another entity.
-
E.
callType
Indicates the category or nature of a call (such as its purpose, direction, or handling), distinguishing one kind of call from another.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab5c96db6c8190a745d6fef7bf2cdb |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bed2fc819086d912cd34285978 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ab5c7780bc81909fc6e173a216cb0b |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.