Triple
T17193267
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dorr v. United States |
E417279
|
entity |
| Predicate | insularCasesCategory |
P126674
|
FINISHED |
| Object | unincorporated territory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: unincorporated territory | Statement: [Dorr v. United States, insularCasesCategory, unincorporated territory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: insularCasesCategory Context triple: [Dorr v. United States, insularCasesCategory, unincorporated territory]
-
A.
courts
Indicates that one entity actively seeks the favor, support, or romantic interest of another through deliberate actions or overtures.
-
B.
hasExclusiveJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one entity holds sole legal authority to adjudicate or govern matters concerning another entity or domain, excluding all other potential authorities.
-
C.
territorialJurisdictionIncludes
Indicates that one authority’s territorial jurisdiction encompasses or extends over a specified geographic area or location.
-
D.
claimsJurisdictionOver
Indicates that one authority or governing body asserts legal power or control over a particular area, matter, or entity.
-
E.
courtIssue
Indicates that a court formally issues or hands down a legal document, order, ruling, or decision to the relevant parties.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d6ba8c819093215917b3d01689 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42d9bd6848190aecc758fc47fcff2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e383141ae0819096acd71683637cbc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e39c2fedb881908bfed2c3e5f2616a |
completed | April 18, 2026, 2:58 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.