Triple
T17193257
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dorr v. United States |
E417279
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hawaii v. Mankichi |
E1190694
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hawaii v. Mankichi | Statement: [Dorr v. United States, relatedCase, Hawaii v. Mankichi]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hawaii v. Mankichi Context triple: [Dorr v. United States, relatedCase, Hawaii v. Mankichi]
-
A.
Hawaii v. Mankichi
chosen
Hawaii v. Mankichi is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the application of constitutional criminal procedure protections in newly annexed U.S. territories, particularly regarding jury trial and grand jury requirements in Hawaii.
-
B.
Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs
Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the federal Apology Resolution did not strip Hawaii of its authority to sell or transfer certain former crown lands, limiting the resolution’s legal effect.
-
C.
Board of Education of the Kingdom of Hawaii
The Board of Education of the Kingdom of Hawaii was the royal-era governmental body responsible for overseeing and administering public education throughout the Hawaiian Kingdom.
-
D.
Yasui v. United States
Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
-
E.
United States v. Kagama
United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d6ba8c819093215917b3d01689 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42d9bd6848190aecc758fc47fcff2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a01674a3a78819094c093daac0e508d |
completed | May 11, 2026, 5:21 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.