Triple
T17193108
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Insular Cases |
E417275
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object |
Gonzales v. Williams
Gonzales v. Williams was a 1904 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the citizenship status of Puerto Ricans following the island’s acquisition by the United States.
|
E1255486
|
NE FINISHED |
How this triple was built (4 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Gonzales v. Williams | Statement: [Insular Cases, hasPart, Gonzales v. Williams]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gonzales v. Williams Context triple: [Insular Cases, hasPart, Gonzales v. Williams]
-
A.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
B.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
-
C.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Gonzales v. Arizona
Gonzales v. Arizona is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of Arizona’s voter identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and voting.
-
E.
Maryland v. Wirtz
Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg
Description generation
gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. # Instructions Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential. # Response Format Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: Gonzales v. Williams Triple: [Insular Cases, hasPart, Gonzales v. Williams]
Generated description
Gonzales v. Williams was a 1904 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the citizenship status of Puerto Ricans following the island’s acquisition by the United States.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Gonzales v. Williams Target entity description: Gonzales v. Williams was a 1904 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the citizenship status of Puerto Ricans following the island’s acquisition by the United States.
-
A.
Crawford v. Washington
Crawford v. Washington is a landmark 2004 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped Confrontation Clause jurisprudence by holding that testimonial hearsay is inadmissible against a criminal defendant unless the witness is unavailable and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
-
B.
Van Orden v. Perry
Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
-
C.
Gooding v. Wilson
Gooding v. Wilson is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that narrowed the “fighting words” doctrine and struck down a Georgia statute as unconstitutionally overbroad under the First Amendment.
-
D.
Gonzales v. Arizona
Gonzales v. Arizona is a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed the constitutionality of Arizona’s voter identification and proof-of-citizenship requirements for voter registration and voting.
-
E.
Maryland v. Wirtz
Maryland v. Wirtz was a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the extension of federal minimum wage and overtime provisions to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (5 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d6ba8c819093215917b3d01689 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42d9bd6848190aecc758fc47fcff2 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
| NED1 | Entity disambiguation (via context triple) | batch_6a015fd393ac8190afc4c076b6cf60ba |
completed | May 11, 2026, 4:49 a.m. |
| NEDg | Description generation | batch_6a016173b06081908fa80d2e530d6c2c |
completed | May 11, 2026, 4:56 a.m. |
| NED2 | Entity disambiguation (via description) | batch_6a0161d384f481909db41bc8c1d263a7 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 4:57 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.