Triple

T17193100
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Insular Cases E417275 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Dooley v. United States E417276 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dooley v. United States | Statement: [Insular Cases, hasPart, Dooley v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dooley v. United States
Context triple: [Insular Cases, hasPart, Dooley v. United States]
  • A. Dooley v. United States chosen
    Dooley v. United States is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped define the constitutional status of newly acquired overseas territories and contributed to the development of the Insular Cases doctrine.
  • B. Dorr v. United States
    Dorr v. United States is a 1904 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the limited application of constitutional rights in unincorporated territories under the Insular Cases doctrine.
  • C. Dennis v. United States
    Dennis v. United States is a landmark 1951 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the convictions of Communist Party leaders under the Smith Act, significantly shaping First Amendment jurisprudence on speech advocating the overthrow of the government.
  • D. United States v. Donovan
    United States v. Donovan is a U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the requirements and scope of federal wiretap procedures and notice obligations under Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968.
  • E. Yates v. United States
    Yates v. United States is a 1957 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed the application of the Smith Act by distinguishing between the advocacy of abstract doctrine and the advocacy of concrete action to overthrow the government.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886d6ba8c819093215917b3d01689 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e42d9bd6848190aecc758fc47fcff2 completed April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a015fd393ac8190afc4c076b6cf60ba completed May 11, 2026, 4:49 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:38 a.m.