Triple
T1718910
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Task Manager |
E37347
|
entity |
| Predicate | canAnalyzeWaitChain |
P30899
|
FINISHED |
| Object | for processes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: for processes | Statement: [Task Manager, canAnalyzeWaitChain, for processes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canAnalyzeWaitChain Context triple: [Task Manager, canAnalyzeWaitChain, for processes]
-
A.
canPass
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to move through, cross, or successfully traverse another entity or barrier.
-
B.
canBe
Indicates that one entity has the potential, permission, or capability to become, perform as, or be classified as another entity.
-
C.
helpsAnalyze
chosen
Indicates that one entity assists another in examining, interpreting, or understanding something in a more detailed or effective way.
-
D.
possibleBranch
Indicates that one entity can serve as an alternative or potential continuation path branching from another entity.
-
E.
canLeadTo
Indicates that one entity, condition, or event has the potential to cause, result in, or bring about another.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab5c96db6c8190a745d6fef7bf2cdb |
completed | March 6, 2026, 11 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bed2fc819086d912cd34285978 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.