Triple
T17185416
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Studio A |
E417093
|
entity |
| Predicate | relativeImportanceAtComplex |
P89351
|
FINISHED |
| Object | one of the primary recording rooms |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: one of the primary recording rooms | Statement: [Studio A, relativeImportanceAtComplex, one of the primary recording rooms]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relativeImportanceAtComplex Context triple: [Studio A, relativeImportanceAtComplex, one of the primary recording rooms]
-
A.
resultImportance
Indicates that one entity specifies how significant, critical, or impactful the outcome or result of another entity is.
-
B.
relativeImportanceToTeam2
Indicates the comparative level of importance or value that one entity has relative to another within the context of a team.
-
C.
relativeImportanceInCountry
Indicates the comparative significance or priority of something within the context of a specific country.
-
D.
localImportance
chosen
Indicates that something holds particular significance, influence, or priority within a specific, limited context or area rather than globally.
-
E.
selectionImportance
Indicates that one option in a set is prioritized or weighted more heavily than others during a selection or decision process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d5f34c8190b24564dfaa63f3fb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e42d962b988190bdbba81ac63c7e6e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 1:19 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e383141ae0819096acd71683637cbc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:37 a.m.