Triple
T17176000
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | attempts to destroy Elora Danan |
E416859
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasCreatorOfWork |
P116500
|
FINISHED |
| Object | George Lucas (story) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: George Lucas (story) | Statement: [attempts to destroy Elora Danan, hasCreatorOfWork, George Lucas (story)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasCreatorOfWork Context triple: [attempts to destroy Elora Danan, hasCreatorOfWork, George Lucas (story)]
-
A.
hasWorkCreator
Indicates that an entity is the creator or originator of a particular work (such as a document, artwork, or other creative product).
-
B.
authorWorkCreator
chosen
Indicates that an entity is the creator (author) responsible for producing a particular work.
-
C.
hasCreatedWorksFor
Indicates that one entity has produced or created works (such as art, documents, or products) on behalf of or for the benefit of another entity.
-
D.
hasSourceWorkCreators
Indicates that a work is associated with the creators of its original source work from which it is derived or adapted.
-
E.
relatedWorkCreator
Indicates that the creator of one work is related (e.g., by authorship, contribution, or collaboration) to the creation of another work.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d5f34c8190b24564dfaa63f3fb |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3fc0cec448190b30466628a2ff23f |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e383141ae0819096acd71683637cbc |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:37 a.m.