Triple
T1716531
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | creation–evolution controversy |
E37302
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | science–religion controversy |
C3648
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: science–religion controversy Context triple: [creation–evolution controversy, instanceOf, science–religion controversy]
-
A.
scientific controversy
A scientific controversy is a sustained public or professional disagreement among scientists over the interpretation of evidence, validity of methods, or implications of findings within a particular field of research.
-
B.
religious controversy
chosen
Religious controversy is a sustained conflict or debate arising from differing beliefs, doctrines, practices, or interpretations within or between religious traditions.
-
C.
theological dispute
A theological dispute is a conflict or debate between individuals or groups over differing interpretations of religious doctrines, beliefs, or sacred texts.
-
D.
ecological controversy
An ecological controversy is a sustained public dispute over environmental issues, typically involving conflicting scientific interpretations, economic interests, cultural values, and policy responses regarding human impacts on ecosystems.
-
E.
Puritan controversy
A Puritan controversy is a historical or theological dispute arising within Puritan communities over matters of doctrine, church governance, or moral practice that challenged established religious authority and norms.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.