Triple

T17162587
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fakhr al-Dawla E416516 entity
Predicate successor P78 FINISHED
Object Shams al-Dawla — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Shams al-Dawla | Statement: [Fakhr al-Dawla, successor, Shams al-Dawla]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Shams al-Dawla
Context triple: [Fakhr al-Dawla, successor, Shams al-Dawla]
  • A. Shams al-Dawla chosen
    Shams al-Dawla was a Buyid dynasty ruler who governed parts of western Iran in the late 10th and early 11th centuries.
  • B. Muizz al-Dawla
    Muizz al-Dawla was a 10th-century Buyid ruler who established Buyid control over Baghdad and became the de facto power behind the Abbasid caliphate in Iraq.
  • C. Sharaf al-Dawla
    Sharaf al-Dawla was a Buyid dynasty ruler who governed parts of Iraq and Iran in the late 10th century, known for consolidating Buyid power in Baghdad.
  • D. Fakhr al-Dawla
    Fakhr al-Dawla was a prominent 10th-century Buyid ruler who governed parts of northern Iran and played a key role in the dynasty’s regional power struggles.
  • E. Baha al-Dawla
    Baha al-Dawla was a prominent 10th–11th century Buyid ruler who governed parts of Iran and Iraq during the later phase of the dynasty’s power.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d886d279c081909f8ff1f743ddeb69 completed April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e3f91316108190b0d856d6fa5cd509 completed April 18, 2026, 9:35 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:37 a.m.