Triple
T17161394
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010 |
E416486
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Treaty of Waitangi settlement legislation |
C9385
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Treaty of Waitangi settlement legislation Context triple: [Waikato-Tainui Raupatu Claims (Waikato River) Settlement Act 2010, instanceOf, Treaty of Waitangi settlement legislation]
-
A.
Treaty of Waitangi case
A Treaty of Waitangi case is a legal proceeding or decision that interprets, applies, or enforces the rights, obligations, and principles arising from the Treaty of Waitangi between the Crown and Māori in New Zealand.
-
B.
Act of Parliament of New Zealand
chosen
An Act of Parliament of New Zealand is a law formally enacted by the New Zealand Parliament that establishes, amends, or repeals legal rules within the country’s jurisdiction.
-
C.
Indian Act
The Indian Act is a Canadian federal law that governs the status, rights, and administration of First Nations peoples and communities, historically enabling extensive government control and assimilation policies.
-
D.
land claims settlement
A land claims settlement is a formal agreement that resolves disputes over land ownership or use rights, typically between governments and Indigenous or local communities, through compensation, land transfers, or legal recognition of rights.
-
E.
Act of Parliament of South Africa
An Act of Parliament of South Africa is a formal law enacted by the South African Parliament that establishes, amends, or repeals legal rules and frameworks within the country’s constitutional system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d279c081909f8ff1f743ddeb69 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:37 a.m.