Triple
T17156688
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Obelisk of Domitian |
E416359
|
entity |
| Predicate | isImitationOf |
P31513
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Egyptian obelisk type |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Egyptian obelisk type | Statement: [Obelisk of Domitian, isImitationOf, Egyptian obelisk type]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isImitationOf Context triple: [Obelisk of Domitian, isImitationOf, Egyptian obelisk type]
-
A.
emulates
chosen
Indicates that one entity imitates or reproduces the behavior, function, or characteristics of another.
-
B.
isRepresentiveOf
Indicates that one entity serves as an official agent, spokesperson, or proxy acting on behalf of another entity.
-
C.
isPersonificationOf
Indicates that one entity represents or embodies an abstract concept, quality, or non-human thing in human form.
-
D.
isAnthropomorphic
Indicates that something non-human is given human-like characteristics, form, or behavior.
-
E.
hasFictionalAlterEgoOf
Indicates that one entity is the fictional alter ego, persona, or alternate identity of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d886d279c081909f8ff1f743ddeb69 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 5:12 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e3f40bf9ec8190b16372bcd091db9b |
completed | April 18, 2026, 9:13 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e3830d2a90819092386717dc56f0e8 |
completed | April 18, 2026, 1:11 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:37 a.m.