Triple
T1713493
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Secretaries of State of Belgium |
E37236
|
entity |
| Predicate | mayHoldPortfolioIn |
P30056
|
FINISHED |
| Object | economic policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: economic policy | Statement: [Secretaries of State of Belgium, mayHoldPortfolioIn, economic policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mayHoldPortfolioIn Context triple: [Secretaries of State of Belgium, mayHoldPortfolioIn, economic policy]
-
A.
mayHold
Indicates that one entity is permitted or allowed to possess, contain, or maintain another entity.
-
B.
holdsStakeThrough
Indicates that one entity possesses an ownership interest in another entity indirectly, via an intermediate entity or instrument.
-
C.
holdsIn
Indicates that a relationship, condition, or event is valid or occurs within a specified time interval or temporal context.
-
D.
membersMayHoldOtherOffices
chosen
Indicates that individuals who are members of a given body or organization are permitted to simultaneously hold additional official positions or offices.
-
E.
hasHolding
Indicates that one entity possesses, controls, or maintains ownership or custody of another entity as an asset or item.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab7521878c8190b9e7739b8c3fc705 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bd46d48190915500d75a9d8e94 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.