Triple
T1712681
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ASO |
E37216
|
entity |
| Predicate | supportsPolicyDevelopmentProcess |
P32236
|
FINISHED |
| Object | number resource policy |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: number resource policy | Statement: [ASO, supportsPolicyDevelopmentProcess, number resource policy]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsPolicyDevelopmentProcess Context triple: [ASO, supportsPolicyDevelopmentProcess, number resource policy]
-
A.
supportsPolicy
Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
-
B.
supportsPolicyArea
Indicates that one entity endorses, advocates for, or is in favor of a particular policy area or domain of public policy.
-
C.
implementedPolicy
Indicates that a particular policy has been put into effect or carried out by an entity.
-
D.
supportsPrinciple
Indicates that one entity endorses, upholds, or actively backs a particular principle or doctrine.
-
E.
hasDevelopmentAgenda
Indicates that an entity maintains or follows a specific plan, set of priorities, or strategic goals guiding its development activities or initiatives.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ab7521878c8190b9e7739b8c3fc705 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69aa61bd46d48190915500d75a9d8e94 |
completed | March 6, 2026, 5:10 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ab752034348190a1cc20955ed24f6f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 12:45 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.