Triple
T1712310
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | IANA Naming Function Contract |
E37209
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | IANA-related agreement |
C5995
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: IANA-related agreement Context triple: [IANA Naming Function Contract, instanceOf, IANA-related agreement]
-
A.
IETF standard
An IETF standard is a formal, consensus-based technical specification developed by the Internet Engineering Task Force that defines protocols, formats, and best practices to ensure interoperability and reliable operation of the Internet.
-
B.
annex to international agreement
An annex to an international agreement is a supplementary document formally attached to the main treaty that provides detailed provisions, technical specifications, or additional obligations that are integral to and legally binding under the agreement.
-
C.
naming agreement
chosen
A naming agreement is a legal contract in which one party grants another the right to use a specific name (such as a personal, brand, or facility name) under defined terms and conditions.
-
D.
international agreement
An international agreement is a formal, negotiated arrangement between two or more sovereign states or international organizations that creates binding obligations under international law.
-
E.
international agreement implementation area
The international agreement implementation area is a defined domain—such as a sector, region, or policy field—within which the provisions of an international agreement are applied, monitored, and enforced.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a8861912dc8190931af43b4b9158a7 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:30 p.m.